You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The accessibility and acceptability of self-management support interventions for men with long term conditions: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Galdas, Zoe Darwin, Lisa Kidd, Christian Blickem, Kerri McPherson, Kate Hunt, Peter Bower, Simon Gilbody, Gerry Richardson |
| Abstract |
Self-management support interventions can improve health outcomes, but their impact is limited by the numbers of people able or willing to access them. Men's attendance at existing self-management support services appears suboptimal despite their increased risk of developing many of the most serious long term conditions. The aim of this review was to determine whether current self-management support interventions are acceptable and accessible to men with long term conditions, and explore what may act as facilitators and barriers to access of interventions and support activities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 29 | 62% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 55% |
| Scientists | 12 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 52 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2018.
All research outputs
#789,577
of 24,674,353 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#815
of 16,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,189
of 372,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#13
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,674,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.