You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
System dynamics model of cervical cancer vaccination and screening interventions in Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-12-26 |
| Authors |
Lucy W Kivuti-Bitok, Geoff McDonnell, Roudsari Abdul, Ganesh P Pokhariyal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 26% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Decision Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#345
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,893
of 369,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.