↓ Skip to main content

Presence of early CKD-related metabolic complications predict progression of stage 3 CKD: a case-controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Presence of early CKD-related metabolic complications predict progression of stage 3 CKD: a case-controlled study
Published in
BMC Nephrology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-15-187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Herbert S Chase, Jamie S Hirsch, Sumit Mohan, Maya K Rao, Jai Radhakrishnan

Abstract

Only a subset of patients who enter stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) progress to stage 4. Identifying which patients entering stage 3 are most likely to progress could improve outcomes, by allowing more appropriate referrals for specialist care, and spare those unlikely to progress the adverse effects and costliness of an unnecessarily aggressive approach. We hypothesized that compared to non-progressors, patients who enter stage 3 CKD and ultimately progress have experienced greater loss of renal function, manifested by impairment of metabolic function (anemia, worsening acidosis and mineral abnormalities), than is reflected in the eGFR at entry to stage 3. The purpose of this case-controlled study was to design a prediction model for CKD progression using laboratory values reflecting metabolic status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 46 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 13 26%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 14 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,183,581
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#996
of 2,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,244
of 361,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.