↓ Skip to main content

A systematic literature review of evidence-based clinical practice for rare diseases: what are the perceived and real barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be overcome?

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic literature review of evidence-based clinical practice for rare diseases: what are the perceived and real barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be overcome?
Published in
Trials, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2287-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Rath, Valérie Salamon, Sandra Peixoto, Virginie Hivert, Martine Laville, Berenice Segrestin, Edmund A. M. Neugebauer, Michaela Eikermann, Vittorio Bertele, Silvio Garattini, Jørn Wetterslev, Rita Banzi, Janus C. Jakobsen, Snezana Djurisic, Christine Kubiak, Jacques Demotes-Mainard, Christian Gluud

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical practice is challenging in all fields, but poses special barriers in the field of rare diseases. The present paper summarises the main barriers faced by clinical research in rare diseases, and highlights opportunities for improvement. Systematic literature searches without meta-analyses and internal European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) communications during face-to-face meetings and telephone conferences from 2013 to 2017 within the context of the ECRIN Integrating Activity (ECRIN-IA) project. Barriers specific to rare diseases comprise the difficulty to recruit participants because of rarity, scattering of patients, limited knowledge on natural history of diseases, difficulties to achieve accurate diagnosis and identify patients in health information systems, and difficulties choosing clinically relevant outcomes. Evidence-based clinical practice for rare diseases should start by collecting clinical data in databases and registries; defining measurable patient-centred outcomes; and selecting appropriate study designs adapted to small study populations. Rare diseases constitute one of the most paradigmatic fields in which multi-stakeholder engagement, especially from patients, is needed for success. Clinical research infrastructures and expertise networks offer opportunities for establishing evidence-based clinical practice within rare diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 34 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 38 32%