You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure: interaction between PaO2/FiO2 and tidal volume
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-017-1861-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yanfei Shen, Weimin Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Malaysia | 4 | 8% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Colombia | 4 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 21% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,137,489
of 24,066,486 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#982
of 6,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,823
of 445,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#27
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,066,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.