↓ Skip to main content

The Antibiofilm efficacy of nitric oxide on soft contact lenses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Antibiofilm efficacy of nitric oxide on soft contact lenses
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12886-017-0604-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dong Ju Kim, Joo-Hee Park, Marth Kim, Choul Yong Park

Abstract

To investigate the antibiofilm efficacy of nitric oxide (NO) on soft contact lenses. Nitrite (NO precursor) release from various concentrations (0-1000 μM) of sodium nitrite (NaNO2, NO donor) was measured by Griess Assay. Cell viability assay was performed using human corneal epithelial cell under various concentration (0-1000 μM) of NaNO2. Biofilm formation on soft contact lenses was achieved by adding Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the culture media. Various concentrations of NaNO2 (0-1000 μM) were added to the culture media, each containing soft contact lens. After incubation in NaNO2 containing culture media for 1, 3, or 7 days, each contact lens was transferred to a fresh, bacteria-free media without NaNO2. The bacteria in the biofilm were dispersed in the culture media for planktonic growth. After reculturing the lenses in the fresh media for 24 h, optical density (OD) of media was measured at 600 nm and colony forming unit (CFU) was counted by spreading media on tryptic soy agar plate for additional 18 h. Nitrite release from NaNO2 showed dose-dependent suppressive effect on biofilm formation. Most nitrite release from NaNO2 tended to occur within 30 min. The viability of human corneal epithelial cells was well maintained at tested NaNO2 concentrations. The bacterial CFU and OD showed dose-dependent decrease in the NaNO2 treated samples on days 1, 3 and 7 for both Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. NO successfully inhibited the biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa on soft contact lenses in dose-dependent manner.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,278,918
of 24,753,534 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#826
of 2,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,348
of 448,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#19
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,753,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.