↓ Skip to main content

A comparative survey of the prevalence of human parasites found in fresh vegetables sold in supermarkets and open-aired markets in Accra, Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative survey of the prevalence of human parasites found in fresh vegetables sold in supermarkets and open-aired markets in Accra, Ghana
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-836
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwabena O Duedu, Elizabeth A Yarnie, Patience B Tetteh-Quarcoo, Simon K Attah, Eric S Donkor, Patrick F Ayeh-Kumi

Abstract

Consuming raw vegetables offers essential nutrients that one may not get when such vegetables are usually cooked. However, eating them raw may pose a great risk for transmissions of pathogens. Such risks may be influenced by the sources of the vegetables and washing techniques used. The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence and diversity of parasitic pathogens associated with vegetables sold at the two types of markets in Ghana and compare effectiveness of various washing techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Master 16 10%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 50 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 60 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2014.
All research outputs
#17,733,724
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,827
of 4,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,890
of 361,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#61
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.