↓ Skip to main content

The impact of rheumatologist-performed ultrasound on diagnosis and management of inflammatory arthritis in routine clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of rheumatologist-performed ultrasound on diagnosis and management of inflammatory arthritis in routine clinical practice
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12891-017-1850-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Kelly, Brian Davidson, Sarah Keidel, Stephan Gadola, Claire Gorman, Gary Meenagh, Piero Reynolds

Abstract

Rheumatologists increasingly perform ultrasound (US) imaging to aid diagnosis and management decisions. There is a need to determine the role of US in facilitating early diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. This study describes the impact of US use by rheumatologists on diagnosis and management of inflammatory arthritis in routine UK clinical practice. We conducted a prospective study in four secondary care rheumatology clinics, each with one consultant who routinely used US and one who did not. Consenting patients aged > 18, newly referred with suspected inflammatory arthritis were included. Data were collected both retrospectively from medical records and via a prospectively-completed physician questionnaire on US use. Analyses were stratified by US/non-US groups and by sub-population of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-diagnosed patients. 258 patients were included; 134 US and 124 non-US. 42% (56/134) of US and 47% (58/124) of non-US were diagnosed with RA. Results described for US and non-US cohorts, respectively as follows. The proportion of patients diagnosed at their first clinic visit was 37% vs 19% overall (p = 0.004) and 41% vs 19% in RA-diagnosed patients (p = 0.01). The median time to diagnosis (months) was 0.85 vs 2.00 (overall, p = 0.0046) and 0.23 vs 1.38 (RA-diagnosed, p = 0.0016). Median time (months) to initiation on a DMARD (where initiated) was 0.62 vs 1.41 (overall, p = 0.0048) and 0.46 vs 1.81 (RA-diagnosed, p = 0.0007). In patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis, routine US use in newly referred patients seems to be associated with significantly earlier diagnosis and DMARD initiation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%