↓ Skip to main content

Essential interventions: implementation strategies and proposed packages of care

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Essential interventions: implementation strategies and proposed packages of care
Published in
Reproductive Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-11-s1-s5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zohra S Lassi, Rohail Kumar, Tarab Mansoor, Rehana A Salam, Jai K Das, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract

In an effort to accelerate progress towards achieving Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 4 and 5, provision of essential reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) interventions is being considered. Not only should a state-of-the-art approach be taken for services delivered to the mother, neonate and to the child, but services must also be deployed across the household to hospital continuum of care approach and in the form of packages. The paper proposed several packages for improved maternal, newborn and child health that can be delivered across RMNCH continuum of care. These packages include: supportive care package for women to promote awareness related to healthy pre-pregnancy and pregnancy interventions; nutritional support package for mother to improve supplementation of essential nutrients and micronutrients; antenatal care package to detect, treat and manage infectious and noninfectious diseases and promote immunization; high risk care package to manage preeclampsia and eclampsia in pregnancy; childbirth package to promote support during labor and importance of skilled birth attendance during labor; essential newborn care package to support healthy newborn care practices; and child health care package to prevent and manage infections. This paper further discussed the implementation strategies for employing these interventions at scale.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 227 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 16%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Lecturer 12 5%
Other 52 22%
Unknown 50 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 20%
Social Sciences 19 8%
Psychology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 55 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,385,510
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,229
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,220
of 235,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#35
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.