↓ Skip to main content

An exploratory study of treated-bed nets in Timor-Leste: patterns of intended and alternative usage

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An exploratory study of treated-bed nets in Timor-Leste: patterns of intended and alternative usage
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-10-199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew A Lover, Brett A Sutton, Angelina J Asy, Annelies Wilder-Smith

Abstract

The Timor-Leste Ministry of Health has recently finalized the National Malaria Control Strategy for 2010-2020. A key component of this roadmap is to provide universal national coverage with long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) in support of achieving the primary goal of reducing both morbidity and mortality from malaria by 30% in the first three years, followed by a further reduction of 20% by end of the programme cycle in 2020 1. The strategic plan calls for this target to be supported by a comprehensive information, education and communication (IEC) programme; however, there is limited prior research into household and personal usage patterns to assist in the creation of targeted, effective, and socio-culturally specific behaviour change materials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 23%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 24%
Social Sciences 28 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 35 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,722,209
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#319
of 5,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,203
of 119,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.