↓ Skip to main content

Direct analysis of mAb aggregates in mammalian cell culture supernatant

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct analysis of mAb aggregates in mammalian cell culture supernatant
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12896-014-0099-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albert J Paul, Karen Schwab, Friedemann Hesse

Abstract

BackgroundProtein aggregation during monoclonal antibody (mAb) production can occur in upstream and downstream processing (DSP). Current methods to determine aggregate formation during cell culture include size exclusion chromatography (SEC) with a previous affinity chromatography step in order to remove disturbing cell culture components. The pre-purification step itself can already influence protein aggregation and therefore does not necessarily reflect the real aggregate content present in cell culture. To analyze mAb aggregate formation directly in the supernatant of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell culture, we established a protocol, which allows aggregate quantification using SEC, without a falsifying pre-purification step.ResultsThe use of a 3 ¿m silica SEC column or a SEC column tailored for mAb aggregate analysis allows the separation of mAb monomer and aggregates from disturbing cell culture components, which enables aggregate determination directly in the supernatant. Antibody aggregate analysis of a mAb-producing CHO DG44 cell line demonstrated the feasibility of the method. Astonishingly, the supernatant of the CHO cells consisted of over 75% mAb dimer and larger oligomers, representing a substantially higher aggregate content than reported in literature so far.ConclusionThis study highlights that aggregate quantification directly in the cell culture supernatant using appropriate SEC columns with suitable mAb aggregate standards is feasible without falsification by previous affinity chromatography. Moreover, our results indicate that aggregate formation should be addressed directly in the cell culture and is not only a problem in DSP.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 18%
Engineering 13 10%
Chemical Engineering 9 7%
Chemistry 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,803,621
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#93
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,680
of 365,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.