↓ Skip to main content

Effects of 28 days of beta-alanine and creatine supplementation on muscle carnosine, body composition and exercise performance in recreationally active females

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of 28 days of beta-alanine and creatine supplementation on muscle carnosine, body composition and exercise performance in recreationally active females
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12970-014-0055-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Y Kresta, Jonathan M Oliver, Andrew R Jagim, James Fluckey, Steven Riechman, Katherine Kelly, Cynthia Meininger, Susanne U Mertens-Talcott, Christopher Rasmussen, Richard B Kreider

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the short-term and chronic effects of β-ALA supplementation with and without creatine monohydrate on body composition, aerobic and anaerobic exercise performance, and muscle carnosine and creatine levels in college-aged recreationally active females.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 19%
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 43 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 44 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#986,620
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#239
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,612
of 442,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#234
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.