↓ Skip to main content

The economic burden of diabetes in India: a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The economic burden of diabetes in India: a review of the literature
Published in
Globalization and Health, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12992-014-0080-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles AK Yesudian, Mari Grepstad, Erica Visintin, Alessandra Ferrario

Abstract

BackgroundDiabetes and its complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in India, and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes is on the rise. This calls for an assessment of the economic burden of the disease.ObjectiveTo conduct a critical review of the literature on cost of illness studies of diabetes and its complications in India.MethodsA comprehensive literature review addressing the study objective was conducted. An extraction table and a scoring system to assess the quality of the studies reviewed were developed.ResultsA total of nineteen articles from different regions of India met the study inclusion criteria. The third party payer perspective was the most common study design (17 articles) while fewer articles (n =2) reported on costs from a health system or societal perspective. All the articles included direct costs and only a few (n =4) provided estimates for indirect costs based on income loss for patients and carers. Drug costs proved to be a significant cost component in several studies (n =12). While middle and high-income groups had higher expenditure in absolute terms, costs constituted a higher proportion of income for the poor. The economic burden was highest among urban groups. The overall quality of the studies is low due of due to a number of methodological weaknesses. The most frequent epidemiological approach employed was the prevalence-based one (n =18) while costs were mainly estimated using a bottom up approach (n =15).ConclusionThe body of literature on the costs of diabetes and its complications in India provides a fragmented picture that has mostly concentrated on the direct costs borne by individuals rather than the healthcare system. There is a need to develop a robust methodology to perform methodologically rigorous and transparent cost of illness studies to inform policy decisions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Unknown 339 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 18%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Postgraduate 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 90 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 29%
Social Sciences 29 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 98 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,458,016
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#414
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,881
of 361,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.