↓ Skip to main content

Positive versus negative mental health in emerging adulthood: a national cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Positive versus negative mental health in emerging adulthood: a national cross-sectional survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Winzer, Frank Lindblad, Kimmo Sorjonen, Lene Lindberg

Abstract

The dual continuum model suggests that positive mental health not only implies the absence of mental illness, but also constitutes an entity of its own. Measures that encompass both positive and negative mental health in young adults are rare. Thus, we assessed whether dimensions corresponding to positive and negative mental health could be identified in a sample of young individuals. Additionally, we explored how such dimensions were associated with potential health-related factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 41 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 46 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,841,893
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,199
of 14,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,168
of 361,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#97
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.