↓ Skip to main content

Association between GDF5 rs143383 polymorphism and knee osteoarthritis: an updated meta-analysis based on 23,995 subjects

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between GDF5 rs143383 polymorphism and knee osteoarthritis: an updated meta-analysis based on 23,995 subjects
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-404
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng Pan, Jing Tian, Tania Winzenberg, Changhai Ding, Graeme Jones

Abstract

Previous studies investigating the association between GDF5 rs143383 polymorphism and knee osteoarthritis (OA) have suggested stronger associations in Asians than Caucasians, but limitations on the amount of available data have meant that a definitive assessment has not been possible. Given the availability of more recent data, the aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the overall association between GDF5 rs143383 polymorphism and knee OA and whether the association varies by ethnicity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#17,733,724
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,892
of 4,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,620
of 361,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#53
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.