↓ Skip to main content

The effects of using the PReDicT Test to guide the antidepressant treatment of depressed patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of using the PReDicT Test to guide the antidepressant treatment of depressed patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2247-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Kingslake, Rebecca Dias, Gerard R. Dawson, Judit Simon, Guy M. Goodwin, Catherine J. Harmer, Richard Morriss, Susan Brown, Boliang Guo, Colin T. Dourish, Henricus G. Ruhé, Anne G. Lever, Dick J. Veltman, Anneke van Schaik, Jürgen Deckert, Andreas Reif, Michael Stäblein, Andreas Menke, Philip Gorwood, Géraldine Voegeli, Victor Pérez, Michael Browning

Abstract

Antidepressant medication is commonly used to treat depression. However, many patients do not respond to the first medication prescribed and improvements in symptoms are generally only detectable by clinicians 4-6 weeks after the medication has been initiated. As a result, there is often a long delay between the decision to initiate an antidepressant medication and the identification of an effective treatment regimen. Previous work has demonstrated that antidepressant medications alter subtle measures of affective cognition in depressed patients, such as the appraisal of facial expression. Furthermore, these cognitive effects of antidepressants are apparent early in the course of treatment and can also predict later clinical response. This trial will assess whether an electronic test of affective cognition and symptoms (the Predicting Response to Depression Treatment Test; PReDicT Test) can be used to guide antidepressant treatment in depressed patients and, therefore, hasten treatment response compared to a control group of patients treated as usual. The study is a randomised, two-arm, multi-centre, open-label, clinical investigation of a medical device, the PReDicT Test. It will be conducted in five European countries (UK, France, Spain, Germany and the Netherlands) in depressed patients who are commencing antidepressant medication. Patients will be randomised to treatment guided by the PReDicT Test (PReDicT arm) or to Treatment as Usual (TaU arm). Patients in the TaU arm will be treated as per current standard guidelines in their particular country. Patients in the PReDicT arm will complete the PReDicT Test after 1 (and if necessary, 2) weeks of treatment. If the test indicates non-response to the treatment, physicians will be advised to immediately alter the patient's antidepressant therapy by dose escalation or switching to another compound. The primary outcome of the study is the proportion of patients showing a clinical response (defined as 50% or greater decrease in baseline scores of depression measured using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - Self-Rated questionnaire) at week 8. Health economic and acceptability data will also be collected and analysed. This trial will test the clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of using the novel PReDicT Test to guide antidepressant treatment selection in depressed patients. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02790970 . Registered on 30 March 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 7 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 49 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 16%
Psychology 18 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 60 39%