↓ Skip to main content

Zoonotic parapoxviruses detected in symptomatic cattle in Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zoonotic parapoxviruses detected in symptomatic cattle in Bangladesh
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edith Lederman, Salah Uddin Khan, Stephen Luby, Hui Zhao, Zachary Braden, JinXin Gao, Kevin Karem, Inger Damon, Mary Reynolds, Yu Li

Abstract

Application of molecular diagnostic methods to the determination of etiology in suspected poxvirus-associated infections of bovines is important both for the diagnosis of the individual case and to form a more complete understanding of patterns of strain occurrence and spread. The objective of this study was to identify and characterize bovine-associated zoonotic poxviruses in Bangladesh which are relevant to animal and human health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,131,716
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,122
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,958
of 365,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#23
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.