↓ Skip to main content

Practice of percutaneous needle autopsy; a descriptive study reporting experiences from Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Clinical Pathology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Practice of percutaneous needle autopsy; a descriptive study reporting experiences from Uganda
Published in
BMC Clinical Pathology, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6890-14-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janneke A Cox, Robert L Lukande, Sam Kalungi, Koen Van de Vijver, Eric Van Marck, Ann M Nelson, Asafu Munema, Yukari C Manabe, Robert Colebunders

Abstract

Percutaneous needle autopsy can overcome a number of barriers that limit the use of complete autopsies. We performed blind-and ultrasound guided needle autopsies in HIV-infected adults in Uganda. In this study we describe in detail the methods we used, the ability of both procedures to obtain sufficient tissue for further examination and the learning curve of the operators over time.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,245,139
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Clinical Pathology
#94
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,268
of 360,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Clinical Pathology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.