Title |
Remifentanil versus fentanyl during cardiac surgery on the incidence of chronic thoracic pain (REFLECT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-466 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sjoerd de Hoogd, Sabine JGM Ahlers, Eric PA van Dongen, Dick Tibboel, Albert Dahan, Catherijne AJ Knibbe |
Abstract |
Chronic thoracic pain after cardiac surgery is prevalent (11 to 56%) and may affect patients' physical and mental health status. Despite its favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, high doses of remifentanil administered during surgery are reported to cause acute postoperative pain and increased requirements for analgesics. Recently, an association between remifentanil use and the incidence of chronic thoracic pain in the long term was also reported. Our objective is to investigate the influence of the intraoperative remifentanil on chronic postoperative pain in a prospective randomized controlled trial.Methods/design: In this prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial, all patients (N =126) between 18 and 85 years undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy receive a continuous infusion of propofol together with intermittent intravenous fentanyl at predetermined times perioperatively. Patients are randomized to receive either an additional continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.15 mug-1kgIBW-1 min-1) or additional fentanyl (200 to 500 mug) as needed during surgery.The primary end point is the prevalence of chronic thoracic pain 12 months after surgery. Secondary end points include acute postoperative pain; postoperative analgesic use; chronic thoracic pain 3 and 6 months after surgery; quality of life (SF-12) at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery; work productivity; and use of health care. In addition, thermal detection and pain thresholds are measured preoperatively, 3 days after surgery and 12 months after surgery using quantitative sensory testing (QST). Finally, the influence of several genetic variances on the different outcomes will be measured. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 24 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 26 | 34% |