↓ Skip to main content

ITScan: a web-based analysis tool for Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ITScan: a web-based analysis tool for Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequences
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-857
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milene Ferro, Erik A Antonio, Wélliton Souza, Maurício Bacci

Abstract

Studies on fungal diversity and ecology aim to identify fungi and to investigate their interactions with each other and with the environment. DNA sequence-based tools are essential for these studies because they can speed up the identification process and access greater fungal diversity than traditional methods. The nucleotide sequence encoding for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the nuclear ribosomal RNA has recently been proposed as a standard marker for molecular identification of fungi and evaluation of fungal diversity. However, the analysis of large sets of ITS sequences involves many programs and steps, which makes this task intensive and laborious.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 17%
Engineering 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,594,271
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,766
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,307
of 373,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#34
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.