You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) for preventive management of COPD patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-12-s2-s9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Filip Velickovski, Luigi Ceccaroni, Josep Roca, Felip Burgos, Juan B Galdiz, Nuria Marina, Magí Lluch-Ariet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 20% |
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 32 | 17% |
| Engineering | 17 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,419
of 4,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,544
of 369,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#56
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.