↓ Skip to main content

The rise in narghile (shisha, hookah) waterpipe tobacco smoking: A qualitative study of perceptions of smokers and non smokers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The rise in narghile (shisha, hookah) waterpipe tobacco smoking: A qualitative study of perceptions of smokers and non smokers
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rima T Nakkash, Joanna Khalil, Rema A Afifi

Abstract

The prevalence of waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) in the Middle East region and worldwide is increasing. There is evidence to indicate both short term and long term health effects of WTS, resulting in the issuance of an advisory note by the World Health Organization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Jordan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 28%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 33%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,697,921
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,099
of 14,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,076
of 110,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#36
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.