↓ Skip to main content

Health literacy: health professionals’ understandings and their perceptions of barriers that Indigenous patients encounter

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health literacy: health professionals’ understandings and their perceptions of barriers that Indigenous patients encounter
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12913-014-0614-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Lambert, Joanne Luke, Bernice Downey, Sue Crengle, Margaret Kelaher, Susan Reid, Janet Smylie

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the growing interest in health literacy, little research has been done around health professionals¿ knowledge of health literacy or understandings of the barriers to health literacy that patients face when navigating the health care system. Indigenous peoples in New Zealand (NZ), Canada and Australia experience numerous inequalities in health status and outcomes and international evidence reveals that Indigenous, minority, and socio-economically disadvantaged populations have greater literacy needs. To address concerns in Indigenous health literacy, a two-pronged approach inclusive of both education of health professionals, and structural reform reducing demands the system places on Indigenous patients, are important steps towards reducing these inequalities.MethodsFour Indigenous health care services were involved in the study. Interviews and one focus group were employed to explore the experiences of health professionals working with patients who had experienced cardiovascular disease (CVD) and were taking medications to prevent future events. A thematic analysis was completed and these insights were used in the development of an intervention that was tested as phase two of the study.ResultsAnalysis of the data identified ten common themes. This paper concentrates on health professionals¿ understanding of health literacy and perceptions of barriers that their patients face when accessing healthcare. Health professionals¿ concepts of health literacy varied and were associated with their perceptions of the barriers that their patients face when attempting to build health literacy skills. These concepts ranged from definitions of health literacy that were focussed on patient deficit to broader definitions that focussed on both patients and the health system. All participants identified a combination of cultural, social and systemic barriers as impediments to their Indigenous patients improving their health literacy knowledge and practices.ConclusionsThis study suggests that health professionals have a limited understanding of health literacy and of the consequences of low health literacy for their Indigenous patients. This lack of understanding combined with the perceived barriers to improving health literacy limit health professionals¿ ability to improve their Indigenous patients¿ health literacy skills and may limit patients¿ capacity to improve understanding of their illness and instructions on how to manage their health condition/s.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 296 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 19%
Student > Bachelor 55 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 78 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 69 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 21%
Social Sciences 27 9%
Psychology 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 86 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,996,050
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,775
of 8,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,104
of 373,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#25
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.