↓ Skip to main content

Frequency of the virilising effects of attenuated androgens reported by women with hereditary angioedema

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequency of the virilising effects of attenuated androgens reported by women with hereditary angioedema
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0205-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zsuzsanna Zotter, Nóra Veszeli, Dorottya Csuka, Lilian Varga, Henriette Farkas

Abstract

BackgroundDanazol, a drug extensively used in the management of hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE), has various side effects. This study investigated the virilizing actions of this drug in 31 danazol-treated female patients with HAE-C1-INH. We compared our findings with those of healthy controls and with literature data.MethodsThe patients were interviewed individually about the type and severity of the virilizing effects, as well as about their satisfaction with danazol therapy.ResultsThe average duration of danazol treatment was 10.31 years [2 to 23] and its mean daily dose was 131.7 mg [33 to 200]. The most common adverse effects were hirsutism (n¿=¿14), weight gain (n¿=¿13), and menstrual disturbances (n¿=¿8). The severity of danazol adverse effects did not differ by duration of treatment or by daily drug dose. The mean level of patient satisfaction with the treatment was high. The comparison of age-matched healthy controls and of HAE-C1-INH patients receiving danazol did not demonstrate a statistically higher incidence of any of the monitored symptoms in the danazol group.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that long-term danazol treatment ¿ using the lowest effective dose ¿ has only a mild virilizing effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,385,510
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,132
of 2,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,671
of 359,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#73
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.