You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomised controlled trial of a preconceptional dietary intervention in women undergoing IVF treatment (PREPARE trial)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-14-130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandra J Kermack, Philip C Calder, Franchesca D Houghton, Keith M Godfrey, Nicholas S Macklon |
| Abstract |
In vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment provides an opportunity to study early developmental responses to periconceptional dietary interventions. Retrospective studies have suggested links between preconception diet and fertility, and more recently, a "Mediterranean" diet has been reported to increase pregnancy rates by up to 40%. In addition, a prospective study examining increased intake of omega-3 polyunsaturated fats demonstrated a quickened rate of embryo development after IVF. However, up to now, few prospective randomised controlled trials have investigated the impact of periconceptional dietary interventions on fertility outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 24% |
| Unknown | 48 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,226,370
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#663
of 1,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,597
of 362,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.