You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Post-crisis Zimbabwe’s innovative financing mechanisms in the social sectors: a practical approach to implementing the new deal for engagement in fragile states
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12914-014-0035-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Salama, Wei Ha, Joel Negin, Samson Muradzikwa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 18 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,458
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,653
of 361,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#108
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.