↓ Skip to main content

Panicle-SEG: a robust image segmentation method for rice panicles in the field based on deep learning and superpixel optimization

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Panicle-SEG: a robust image segmentation method for rice panicles in the field based on deep learning and superpixel optimization
Published in
Plant Methods, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13007-017-0254-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiong Xiong, Lingfeng Duan, Lingbo Liu, Haifu Tu, Peng Yang, Dan Wu, Guoxing Chen, Lizhong Xiong, Wanneng Yang, Qian Liu

Abstract

Rice panicle phenotyping is important in rice breeding, and rice panicle segmentation is the first and key step for image-based panicle phenotyping. Because of the challenge of illumination differentials, panicle shape deformations, rice accession variations, different reproductive stages and the field's complex background, rice panicle segmentation in the field is a very large challenge. In this paper, we propose a rice panicle segmentation algorithm called Panicle-SEG, which is based on simple linear iterative clustering superpixel regions generation, convolutional neural network classification and entropy rate superpixel optimization. To build the Panicle-SEG-CNN model and test the segmentation effects, 684 training images and 48 testing images were randomly selected, respectively. Six indicators, including Qseg, Sr, SSIM, Precision, Recall and F-measure, are employed to evaluate the segmentation effects, and the average segmentation results for the 48 testing samples are 0.626, 0.730, 0.891, 0.821, 0.730, and 76.73%, respectively. Compared with other segmentation approaches, including HSeg, i2 hysteresis thresholding and jointSeg, the proposed Panicle-SEG algorithm has better performance on segmentation accuracy. Meanwhile, the executing speed is also improved when combined with multithreading and CUDA parallel acceleration. Moreover, Panicle-SEG was demonstrated to be a robust segmentation algorithm, which can be expanded for different rice accessions, different field environments, different camera angles, different reproductive stages, and indoor rice images. The testing dataset and segmentation software are available online. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that Panicle-SEG is a robust method for panicle segmentation, and it creates a new opportunity for nondestructive yield estimation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 40 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 27%
Computer Science 15 13%
Engineering 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 44 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,221,670
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#596
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,978
of 438,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#19
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.