↓ Skip to main content

Control under times of uncertainty: the relationship between hospital competition and physician-patient disputes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Control under times of uncertainty: the relationship between hospital competition and physician-patient disputes
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12939-017-0701-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qian Yang, Jay Pan

Abstract

Recently, cases of medical disputes and even acts of violence toward physicians by patients in China have been escalating. It remains unknown whether competition improves the patient-physician relationship. This paper analyzes the relationship between hospital competition and the probability of medical disputes occurrence according to the theory of social control. Data from all hospitals in the Sichuan province of China from 2011 to 2014 were included in the study. The fixed radius approach with GIS information was employed to define hospital market, and the differences in competition over time and across regions were utilized. Our analysis is based on the fixed effect estimation, which accounts for the time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity among hospitals. We found an inversed U-shaped relationship between HHI and the likelihood of medical disputes. As beneath either situation of monopoly or full competition, the burst of physician-patient dispute was downward into a valley, but it rises and then falls again with the increase of HHI, it reached the peak at the typical semi-market hospital competition structure. Our results highlight the probability of change in disputes occurrence with the transition of hospital competition and its psychological explanation, providing implications for China's future health reform.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Other 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Psychology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,921,555
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,657
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,986
of 438,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#36
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.