↓ Skip to main content

Cytotoxic effects of Euterpe oleracea Mart. in malignant cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytotoxic effects of Euterpe oleracea Mart. in malignant cell lines
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dulcelena Ferreira Silva, Flávia Castello Branco Vidal, Debora Santos, Maria Célia Pires Costa, José Andrés Morgado-Díaz, Maria do Desterro Soares Brandão Nascimento, Roberto Soares de Moura

Abstract

Euterpe oleracea Mart., a plant from the Amazon region, is commonly known as açaí or juçara; it has high nutritional value and elevated levels of lipids, proteins, and minerals. Açaí is an abundant and much consumed fruit by the Amazon local population, and studies have demonstrated that it is rich in phytochemicals with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer activities. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test this plant for anticancer activity in different human malignant cell lines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Unknown 109 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,297,723
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#209
of 3,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,847
of 226,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#7
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.