↓ Skip to main content

Combination of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combination of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review
Published in
Critical Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0675-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han Chen, Rong-Guo Yu, Ning-Ning Yin, Jian-Xin Zhou

Abstract

IntroductionExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used in critically ill patients presenting acute cardiac and/or pulmonary dysfunctions, who are at high risk of developing acute kidney injury and fluid overload. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is commonly used in intensive care units (ICU) to provide renal replacement and fluid management. We conducted a review to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the combination of ECMO and CRRT and to illustrate the indications and methodology of providing renal replacement therapy during the ECMO procedure.MethodWe searched for all published reports of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), quasi-RCT, or other comparative study design, conducted in patients undergoing ECMO plus CRRT. Two reviewers independently selected potential studies and extracted data. We used the modified Jadad scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa for quality assessment of RCTs and non-RCTs, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.2.ResultsWe identified 19 studies meeting the eligibility criteria (seven cohort, six case control, one historically controlled trial and five studies of technical aspects). There are three major methods for performing CRRT during ECMO: ¿independent CRRT access¿, ¿introduction of a hemofiltration filter into the ECMO circuit (in-line hemofilter)¿ and ¿introduction of a CRRT device into the ECMO circuit¿. We conducted a review with limited data synthesis rather than a formal meta-analysis because there could be greater heterogeneity in a systematic review of non-randomized studies than that of randomized trials. For ECMO survivors receiving CRRT, overall fluid balance was less than that in non-CRRT survivors. There was a higher mortality and a longer ECMO duration when CRRT was added, which may reflect a relatively higher severity of illness in patients who received ECMO plus CRRT.ConclusionThe combination of ECMO and CRRT in a variety of methods appears to be a safe and effective technique that improves fluid balance and electrolyte disturbances. Prospective studies would be beneficial in determining the potential of this technique to improve the outcome in critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 173 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 15%
Other 23 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Engineering 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 48 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,535,552
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,357
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,276
of 368,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.