↓ Skip to main content

Peer assisted learning among Sri Lankan medical undergraduates: a cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peer assisted learning among Sri Lankan medical undergraduates: a cross sectional study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2920-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nipun Lakshitha de Silva, Balasundaram Parththipan, Chaturaka Rodrigo, Godwin Constantine, Sumadhya Deepika Fernando, Senaka Rajapakse

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to; (a) evaluate the current practices of peer assisted learning among second year and final year medical students of Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka; (b) identify reasons for engaging in peer assisted learning; (c) identify perceived weaknesses in current learning activities; and (d) determine student characteristics associated with engaging in peer assisted learning. This cross sectional study interviewed two hundred and eighty-four eligible students. Average number of hours spent on peer assisted learning during a week was significantly greater among second year students compared to final year students (15.1 vs. 7.1 h, p < 0.05). Overall, female students were more likely to engage in peer assisted learning than male students. In second year, most common method of peer assisted learning was mass lectures offered by batch mates or seniors, while in final year it was group discussions. This reflected a transition to more focused, interactive, active learning among senior students.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 26%
Lecturer 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 47%
Engineering 2 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 30%