↓ Skip to main content

Are we missing opportunities? Physiotherapy and physical activity promotion: a cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 559)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
164 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are we missing opportunities? Physiotherapy and physical activity promotion: a cross-sectional survey
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13102-017-0084-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Freene, Sophie Cools, Bernie Bissett

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) promotion in healthcare is an important strategy for increasing PA levels. Physiotherapists are well-positioned to promote PA, however no studies have investigated PA promotion by physiotherapists Australia-wide. An online survey of practicing Australian physiotherapists was conducted to investigate knowledge of the Australian Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour (PASB) guidelines and factors associated with increased promotion frequency. Participants were asked to state the PASB guidelines and a 4-component scoring system was used to measure knowledge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess factors associated with frequency of promotion. 257 Australian physiotherapists completed the survey. Only 10% were able to accurately state the PASB guidelines and 54% reported promoting PA to 10 or more patients per month. Males were nearly three times more likely than females to promote PA to 10 or more patients per month (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.25-5.74). Those who lacked counselling skills and felt PA promotion wouldn't change their patients' behaviour were much less likely to promote PA. Australian physiotherapists have poor knowledge of the Australian PASB guidelines and infrequently promote PA. Education and training in PA counselling and behaviour change strategies is indicated to enhance PA promotion by Australian physiotherapists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Sports and Recreations 8 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 42 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#339,207
of 24,601,689 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#10
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,757
of 448,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,601,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.