↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of brain midline shift using sonography in neurosurgical ICU patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of brain midline shift using sonography in neurosurgical ICU patients
Published in
Critical Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0676-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Motuel, Isaure Biette, Mohamed Srairi, Ségolène Mrozek, Matt M Kurrek, Patrick Chaynes, Christophe Cognard, Olivier Fourcade, Thomas Geeraerts

Abstract

IntroductionBrain midline shift (MLS) is a life-threatening condition that requires urgent diagnosis and treatment. We aimed to validate bedside assessment of MLS with Transcranial Sonography (TCS) in neurosurgical ICU patients by comparing it to CT.MethodsIn this prospective single centre study, patients who underwent a head CT were included and a concomitant TCS performed. TCS MLS was determined by measuring the difference between the distance from skull to the third ventricle on both sides, using a 2 to 4 MHz probe through the temporal window. CT MLS was measured as the difference between the ideal midline and the septum pellucidum. A significant MLS was defined on head CT as >0.5 cm.ResultsA total of 52 neurosurgical ICU patients were included. The MLS (mean¿±¿SD) was 0.32¿±¿0.36 cm using TCS and 0.47¿±¿0.67 cm using CT. The Pearson¿s correlation coefficient (r2) between TCS and CT scan was 0.65 (P <0.001). The bias was 0.09 cm and the limits of agreements were 1.10 and -0.92 cm. The area under the ROC curve for detecting a significant MLS with TCS was 0.86 (95% CI =0.74 to 0.94), and, using 0.35 cm as a cut-off, the sensitivity was 84.2%, the specificity 84.8% and the positive likelihood ratio =5.56.ConclusionsThis study suggests that TCS could detect MLS with reasonable accuracy in neurosurgical ICU patients and that it could serve as a bedside tool to facilitate early diagnosis and treatment for patients with a significant intracranial mass effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,238,835
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,584
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,133
of 368,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#66
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.