↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with institutional delivery in Ghana: the role of decision-making autonomy and community norms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with institutional delivery in Ghana: the role of decision-making autonomy and community norms
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12884-014-0398-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilene S Speizer, William T Story, Kavita Singh

Abstract

In Ghana, the site of this study, the maternal mortality ratio and under-five mortality rate remain high indicating the need to focus on maternal and child health programming. Ghana has high use of antenatal care (95%) but sub-optimum levels of institutional delivery (about 57%). Numerous barriers to institutional delivery exist including financial, physical, cognitive, organizational, and psychological and social. This study examines the psychological and social barriers to institutional delivery, namely women's decision-making autonomy and their perceptions about social support for institutional delivery in their community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 379 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 25%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Lecturer 31 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 6%
Other 66 17%
Unknown 88 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 103 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 80 21%
Social Sciences 35 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 3%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 102 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,525,064
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#966
of 4,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,848
of 373,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#10
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.