↓ Skip to main content

The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score; validation in Dutch and first-time assessment of its smallest detectable change

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score; validation in Dutch and first-time assessment of its smallest detectable change
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0286-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Just A. van der Linde, Derk A. van Kampen, Loes W. A. H. van Beers, Derek F. P. van Deurzen, Caroline B. Terwee, W. Jaap Willems

Abstract

The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) is a short, self-reported outcome measurement for patients with shoulder instability. In this study, the OSIS was validated in Dutch by testing the internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, validity and the floor and ceiling effects, and its smallest detectable change (SDC) was calculated. A total of 138 patients were included. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's α. Reliability (test-retest) was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The measurement error was calculated (SEM), and the SDC was estimated in a subgroup of 99 patients that completed the re-test after a mean of 13 days (5-30 days). Construct validity was evaluated by comparing the OSIS with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand assessment (DASH), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach's α of 0.88. The reliability was excellent, with an ICC of 0.87. The SEM was 3.3 and the SDC was 9 points (on a scale of 0-48). Regarding the construct validity, 80 % of the results were in accordance with the hypotheses, including a high correlation (0.82) with the WOSI. No floor or ceiling effects were found. The Dutch version of the OSIS showed good reliability and validity in a cohort of patients with shoulder instability.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 25%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Other 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 19 28%