↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic value of active protraction and retraction for sternoclavicular joint pain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic value of active protraction and retraction for sternoclavicular joint pain
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Van Tongel, Anne Karelse, Bart Berghs, Tom Van Isacker, Lieven De Wilde

Abstract

Sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) arthropathy is an uncommon cause of mechanical pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of two active clinical tests for localizing the sternoclavicular joint as the source of mechanical pain.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Psychology 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Design 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#13,185,276
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,826
of 4,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,862
of 361,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#34
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.