You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genes & Nutrition, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12263-014-0450-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Celis-Morales, Katherine M. Livingstone, Cyril F. M. Marsaux, Hannah Forster, Clare B. O’Donovan, Clara Woolhead, Anna L. Macready, Rosalind Fallaize, Santiago Navas-Carretero, Rodrigo San-Cristobal, Silvia Kolossa, Kai Hartwig, Lydia Tsirigoti, Christina P. Lambrinou, George Moschonis, Magdalena Godlewska, Agnieszka Surwiłło, Keith Grimaldi, Jildau Bouwman, E. J. Daly, Victor Akujobi, Rick O’Riordan, Jettie Hoonhout, Arjan Claassen, Ulrich Hoeller, Thomas E. Gundersen, Siv E. Kaland, John N. S. Matthews, Yannis Manios, Iwona Traczyk, Christian A. Drevon, Eileen R. Gibney, Lorraine Brennan, Marianne C. Walsh, Julie A. Lovegrove, J. Alfredo Martinez, Wim H. M. Saris, Hannelore Daniel, Mike Gibney, John C. Mathers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 31% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 21% |
| Unknown | 63 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2021.
All research outputs
#703,748
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#11
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,616
of 371,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.