You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human mesenchymal stem cells possess different biological characteristics but do not change their therapeutic potential when cultured in serum free medium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt522 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Youwei Wang, Hehe Wu, Zhouxin Yang, Ying Chi, Lei Meng, Aibin Mao, Shulin Yan, Shanshan Hu, Jianzhong Zhang, Yun Zhang, Wenbo Yu, Yue Ma, Tao Li, Yan Cheng, Yongjuan Wang, Shanshan Wang, Jing Liu, Jingwen Han, Caiyun Li, Li Liu, Jian Xu, Zhi Bo Han, Zhong Chao Han |
| Abstract |
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely investigated in clinical researches to treat various diseases. Classic culture medium for MSCs, even for clinical use, contains fetal bovine serum. The serum-containing medium (SCM) seems a major obstacle for MSCs-related therapies due to the risk of contamination of infectious pathogens. Some studies showed that MSCs could be expanded in serum free medium (SFM); however, whether SFM would change the biological characteristics and safety issues of MSCs has not been well answered. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 27% |
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,244,182
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#298
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,803
of 360,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.