You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two Antarctic penguin genomes reveal insights into their evolutionary history and molecular changes related to the Antarctic environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-217x-3-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cai Li, Yong Zhang, Jianwen Li, Lesheng Kong, Haofu Hu, Hailin Pan, Luohao Xu, Yuan Deng, Qiye Li, Lijun Jin, Hao Yu, Yan Chen, Binghang Liu, Linfeng Yang, Shiping Liu, Yan Zhang, Yongshan Lang, Jinquan Xia, Weiming He, Qiong Shi, Sankar Subramanian, Craig D Millar, Stephen Meader, Chris M Rands, Matthew K Fujita, Matthew J Greenwold, Todd A Castoe, David D Pollock, Wanjun Gu, Kiwoong Nam, Hans Ellegren, Simon YW Ho, David W Burt, Chris P Ponting, Erich D Jarvis, M Thomas P Gilbert, Huanming Yang, Jian Wang, David M Lambert, Jun Wang, Guojie Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 17% |
| United States | 7 | 12% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 63% |
| Scientists | 14 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 42 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 213. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#185,525
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#11
of 1,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,897
of 365,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.