↓ Skip to main content

Methylglyoxal as a new biomarker in patients with septic shock: an observational clinical study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methylglyoxal as a new biomarker in patients with septic shock: an observational clinical study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0683-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thorsten Brenner, Thomas Fleming, Florian Uhle, Stephan Silaff, Felix Schmitt, Eduardo Salgado, Alexis Ulrich, Stefan Zimmermann, Thomas Bruckner, Eike Martin, Angelika Bierhaus, Peter P Nawroth, Markus A Weigand, Stefan Hofer

Abstract

IntroductionThe role of reactive carbonyl species, such as methylglyoxal (MG) has been overlooked within the context of the sepsis syndrome. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of MG formation in different inflammatory settings and to evaluate its use for early diagnosis as well as prognosis of the sepsis syndrome.MethodsIn total, 120 patients in three groups were enrolled in this observational clinical pilot study. The three groups included patients with septic shock (n =60), postoperative controls (n =30) and healthy volunteers (n =30). Plasma samples from patients with septic shock were collected at sepsis onset, after 24 hours, 4 days, 7 days, 14 days and 28 days. Plasma samples from postoperative controls were collected prior to surgery, immediately following the end of the surgical procedure as well as 24 hours later, and from healthy volunteers once. Plasma levels of MG were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Additionally, plasma levels of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, soluble CD14 subtype and interleukin-6 were determined.ResultsPatients with septic shock showed significantly higher plasma levels of MG at all measured times, compared to postoperative controls. MG was found to identify patients with septic shock more effectively (area under the curve (AUC): 0.993) than procalcitonin (AUC: 0.844), C-reactive protein (AUC: 0.791), soluble CD14 subtype (AUC: 0.832) and interleukin-6 (AUC: 0.898) as assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Moreover, plasma levels of MG in non-survivors were significantly higher than in survivors (sepsis onset: P =0.008** for 28-day survival; P =0.018* for 90-day survival). Plasma levels of MG proved to be an early predictor for survival in patients with septic shock (sepsis onset: ROC-AUC 0.710 for 28-day survival; ROC-AUC 0.686 for 90-day survival).ConclusionsMG was identified as a marker for monitoring the onset, development and remission of sepsis, and was found to be more useful than routine diagnostic markers. Further studies are required to determine the extent of MG modification in sepsis and whether targeting this pathway could be therapeutically beneficial to the patient.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00000505. Registered 8 November 2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,621,892
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,801
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,403
of 363,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#44
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.