You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating a tailored e-health self-management application for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients into primary care: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Viola Voncken-Brewster, Huibert Tange, Albine Moser, Zsolt Nagykaldi, Hein de Vries, Trudy van der Weijden |
| Abstract |
Changes in reimbursement have been compelling for Dutch primary care practices to apply a disease management approach for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This approach includes individual patient consultations with a practice nurse, who coaches patients in COPD management. The aim of this study was to gauge the feasibility of adding a web-based patient self-management support application, by assessing patients' self-management, patients' health status, the impact on the organization of care, and the level of application use and appreciation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Colombia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,866,293
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#886
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,349
of 318,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#17
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.