↓ Skip to main content

Deficient nitric oxide signalling impairs skeletal muscle growth and performance: involvement of mitochondrial dysregulation

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Muscle, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deficient nitric oxide signalling impairs skeletal muscle growth and performance: involvement of mitochondrial dysregulation
Published in
Skeletal Muscle, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13395-014-0022-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clara De Palma, Federica Morisi, Sarah Pambianco, Emma Assi, Thierry Touvier, Stefania Russo, Cristiana Perrotta, Vanina Romanello, Silvia Carnio, Valentina Cappello, Paolo Pellegrino, Claudia Moscheni, Maria Teresa Bassi, Marco Sandri, Davide Cervia, Emilio Clementi

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO), generated in skeletal muscle mostly by the neuronal NO synthases (nNOSμ), has profound effects on both mitochondrial bioenergetics and muscle development and function. The importance of NO for muscle repair emerges from the observation that nNOS signalling is defective in many genetically diverse skeletal muscle diseases in which muscle repair is dysregulated. How the effects of NO/nNOSμ on mitochondria impact on muscle function, however, has not been investigated yet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 8 9%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Sports and Recreations 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,735,392
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#59
of 390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,258
of 364,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.