↓ Skip to main content

An improved genome of the model marine alga Ostreococcus tauri unfolds by assessing Illumina de novo assemblies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An improved genome of the model marine alga Ostreococcus tauri unfolds by assessing Illumina de novo assemblies
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Romain Blanc-Mathieu, Bram Verhelst, Evelyne Derelle, Stephane Rombauts, François-Yves Bouget, Isabelle Carré, Annie Château, Adam Eyre-Walker, Nigel Grimsley, Hervé Moreau, Benoit Piégu, Eric Rivals, Wendy Schackwitz, Yves Van de Peer, Gwenaël Piganeau

Abstract

Cost effective next generation sequencing technologies now enable the production of genomic datasets for many novel planktonic eukaryotes, representing an understudied reservoir of genetic diversity. O. tauri is the smallest free-living photosynthetic eukaryote known to date, a coccoid green alga that was first isolated in 1995 in a lagoon by the Mediterranean sea. Its simple features, ease of culture and the sequencing of its 13 Mb haploid nuclear genome have promoted this microalga as a new model organism for cell biology. Here, we investigated the quality of genome assemblies of Illumina GAIIx 75 bp paired-end reads from Ostreococcus tauri, thereby also improving the existing assembly and showing the genome to be stably maintained in culture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Researcher 25 23%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,502,063
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,443
of 11,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,898
of 363,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#64
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.