↓ Skip to main content

Helpful self-management strategies to cope with enduring depression from the patients’ point of view: a concept map study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Helpful self-management strategies to cope with enduring depression from the patients’ point of view: a concept map study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0331-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosa A van Grieken, Anneloes CE Kirkenier, Maarten WJ Koeter, Aart H Schene

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the development of various self-management programmes that attempt to ameliorate symptoms of patients with chronic major depressive disorder (MDD), little is known about what these patients perceive as helpful in their struggle during daily live. The present study aims to explore what patients believe they can do themselves to cope with enduring MDD besides professional treatment, and which self-management strategies patients perceive as being most helpful to cope with their MDD.MethodsWe used concept mapping, a method specifically designed for the conceptualisation of a specific subject, in this case patients¿ point of view (n¿=¿25) on helpful self-management strategies in their coping with enduring MDD. A purposive sample of participants was invited at the Academic Medical Center and through requests on several MDD-patient websites in the Netherlands. Participants generated strategies in focus group discussions which were successively clustered on a two-dimensional concept map by hierarchical cluster analysis.ResultsFifty strategies were perceived as helpful. They were combined into three meta-clusters each comprising two clusters: A focus on the depression (sub clusters: Being aware that my depression needs active coping and Active coping with professional treatment); An active lifestyle (sub clusters: Active self-care, structure and planning and Free time activities) and Participation in everyday social life (sub clusters: Social engagement and Work-related activities).ConclusionsMDD patients believe they can use various strategies to cope with enduring MDD in daily life. Although current developments in e-health occur, patients emphasise on face-to-face treatments and long-term relations, being engaged in social and working life, and involving their family, friends, colleagues and clinicians in their disease management. Our findings may help clinicians to improve their knowledge about what patients consider beneficial to cope with enduring MDD and to incorporate these suggested self-management strategies in their treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 39 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,617,403
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,201
of 5,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,220
of 361,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#42
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.