↓ Skip to main content

Synergy in monoclonal antibody neutralization of HIV-1 pseudoviruses and infectious molecular clones

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synergy in monoclonal antibody neutralization of HIV-1 pseudoviruses and infectious molecular clones
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12967-014-0346-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riccardo Miglietta, Claudia Pastori, Assunta Venuti, Christina Ochsenbauer, Lucia Lopalco

Abstract

BackgroundEarly events in HIV infection are still poorly understood; virus derived from acute infections, the transmitted/founders IMCs, could provide more reliable information as they represent strains that established HIV infection in vivo, and therefore are investigated to elucidate potentially shared biological features.MethodsThis study examined synergy in neutralization by six monoclonal antibodies targeting different domains in gp120 and gp41 and assayed in pairwise combination against 11 HIV-1 clade B strains, either Env pseudoviruses (PV, n¿=¿5) or transmitted/founder infectious molecular clones (T/F IMCs, n¿=¿6). Three of the early-infection env tested as PV were juxtaposed with T/F viruses derived from the same three patients, respectively.ResultsAll antibodies reaching IC50 were assayed pairwise (n¿=¿50). T/F IMCs showed overall lower sensitivity to neutralization by single antibodies than PV, including within the three patient-matched pairs. Remarkably, combination index (CI) calculated using the Chow and Talalay method indicated synergy (CI¿<¿0.9) in 42 data sets, and occurred in T/F IMC at similar proportions (15 of 17 antibody-T/F IMC combinations tested) as in pseudoviruses (27 of 33). CI values indicative of additivity and low-level antagonism were seen in 5 and 3 cases, respectively. Most pairs showed comparable synergic neutralizing effects on both virus groups, with the 4E10¿+¿PG16 pair achieving the best synergic effects. Variability in neutralization was mostly observed on pseudovirus isolates, suggesting that factors other than virus isolation technology, such as env conformation, epitope accessibility and antibody concentration, are likely to affect polyclonal neutralization.ConclusionsThe findings from this study suggest that inhibitory activity of bNAbs can be further augmented through appropriate combination, even against viruses representing circulating strains, which are likely to exhibit a less sensitive Tier 2 neutralization phenotype. This notion has important implications for the design and development of anti-Env bNAb-inducing vaccines and polyclonal sera for passive immunization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 34%
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,712,517
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,408
of 4,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,312
of 357,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#98
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.