↓ Skip to main content

Differential experiences of discrimination among ethnoracially diverse persons experiencing mental illness and homelessness

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential experiences of discrimination among ethnoracially diverse persons experiencing mental illness and homelessness
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0353-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne Zerger, Sarah Bacon, Simon Corneau, Anna Skosireva, Kwame McKenzie, Susan Gapka, Patricia O’Campo, Aseefa Sarang, Vicky Stergiopoulos

Abstract

BackgroundThis mixed methods study explored the characteristics of and experiences with perceived discrimination in an ethnically diverse urban sample of adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness.MethodsData were collected in Toronto, Ontario, as part of a 4-year national randomized field trial of the Housing First treatment model. Rates of perceived discrimination were captured from survey questions regarding perceived discrimination among 231 ethnoracially diverse participants with moderate mental health needs. The qualitative component included thirty six in-depth interviews which explored how individuals who bear these multiple identities of oppression navigate stigma and discrimination, and what affects their capacity to do so.ResultsQuantitative analysis revealed very high rates of perceived discrimination related to: homelessness/poverty (61.5%), race/ethnicity/skin colour (50.6%) and mental illness/substance use (43.7%). Immigrants and those who had been homeless three or more years reported higher perceived discrimination on all three domains. Analysis of qualitative interviews revealed three common themes related to navigating these experiences of discrimination among participants: 1) social distancing; 2) old and new labels/identities; and, 3) `homeland¿ cultures.ConclusionsThese study findings underscore poverty and homelessness as major sources of perceived discrimination, and expose underlying complexities in the navigation of multiple identities in responding to stigma and discrimination.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN42520374. Registered 18 August 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 207 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 70 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 18%
Psychology 34 16%
Social Sciences 31 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 73 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,386,678
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,871
of 4,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,982
of 354,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#70
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.