↓ Skip to main content

Integrative Bayesian variable selection with gene-based informative priors for genome-wide association studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomic Data, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrative Bayesian variable selection with gene-based informative priors for genome-wide association studies
Published in
BMC Genomic Data, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12863-014-0130-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoshuai Zhang, Fuzhong Xue, Hong Liu, Dianwen Zhu, Bin Peng, Joseph L Wiemels, Xiaowei Yang

Abstract

BackgroundGenome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) are typically designed to identify phenotype-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) individually using univariate analysis methods. Though providing valuable insights into genetic risks of common diseases, the genetic variants identified by GWAS generally account for only a small proportion of the total heritability for complex diseases. To solve this ¿missing heritability¿ problem, we implemented a strategy called integrative Bayesian Variable Selection (iBVS), which is based on a hierarchical model that incorporates an informative prior by considering the gene interrelationship as a network. It was applied here to both simulated and real data sets.ResultsSimulation studies indicated that the iBVS method was advantageous in its performance with highest AUC in both variable selection and outcome prediction, when compared to Stepwise and LASSO based strategies. In an analysis of a leprosy case¿control study, iBVS selected 94 SNPs as predictors, while LASSO selected 100 SNPs. The Stepwise regression yielded a more parsimonious model with only 3 SNPs. The prediction results demonstrated that the iBVS method had comparable performance with that of LASSO, but better than Stepwise strategies.ConclusionsThe proposed iBVS strategy is a novel and valid method for Genome-wide Association Studies, with the additional advantage in that it produces more interpretable posterior probabilities for each variable unlike LASSO and other penalized regression methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Mathematics 2 8%
Computer Science 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#606
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,025
of 368,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#16
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.