Title |
Quality of hip and knee osteoarthritis management in primary health care in a Norwegian county: a cross-sectional survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-014-0598-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gudmund Grønhaug, Nina Østerås, Kåre Birger Hagen |
Abstract |
BackgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common causes of pain and disability in the adult population. Several studies have documented discordance between general practioners (GP) practice and management recommendations, but there is limited published information about patient reported experience of quality of care. The primary aim of this study was to assess the patient perceived quality of OA management in primary health care. Secondly, we wanted to explore the factors associated with the perceived quality of OA care.MethodsA cross-sectional survey in six general practices in the county of Nord-Trøndelag in Norway, patients with radiologically diagnosed OA, according to ICPC codes L89, L90 or L91 or clinical signs and symptoms corresponding to OA in the hip or knee and patient-reported quality of OA care on the 17-item OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire (OA-QI). OA-QI summary pass rates were calculated, in which the numerator represents the number with indicators passed and the denominator represents the total number of eligible persons. Associations with summary pass rates were explored with demographic, disease related and health care related factors as independent variables.ResultsA total of 119 patients were included (response rate 42%). The median summary QI pass rate for all 17 QIs was 47% (Inter Quartile Range 33-65%), but there were large variation between the different items. The referral for weight reduction had the lowest pass rate (8%), whereas the highest pass rate was having received information about the importance of physical activity and exercise (84%). The median summary QI pass rates for both non-pharmacological- (QIs 1¿11) and pharmacological (QIs 13¿16) treatments were 50% (IQR 25¿75). In bivariate regression analyses, only overall treatment satisfaction was significantly associated with QI pass rate (p=0.001), with unstandardized beta=6.1 (95% CI 2.7 to 9.5), i.e. a one-point increase on the five-point satisfaction scale was associated with a 6% increase in pass rate.ConclusionConsidering that the median summary QI pass rate was 47%, there might be room for improvement in OA care. Advice and the referral of OA patients in need of weight reduction seem to have the greatest potential for improvement. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 22% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 18% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 27% |