↓ Skip to main content

The protective effects of a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, sildenafil, on postresuscitation cardiac dysfunction of cardiac arrest: metabolic evidence from microdialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The protective effects of a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, sildenafil, on postresuscitation cardiac dysfunction of cardiac arrest: metabolic evidence from microdialysis
Published in
Critical Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0641-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qian Zhang, Wei Yuan, Guoxing Wang, Junyuan Wu, Miaomiao Wang, ChunSheng Li

Abstract

IntroductionRecent experimental and clinical studies have indicated the cardioprotective role of sildenafil during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. The aim of the study was to determine if sildenafil will reduce the severity of post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction and lead to cardioprotection through the beneficial effects on energy metabolism by obtaining metabolic evidence from microdialysis.MethodsTwenty-four male pigets were randomly divided into three groups, sildenafil (n =8), saline (SA; n =8); and sham operation (SHAM; n =8). Sildenafil pretreatment consisted of 0.5 mg/kg sildenafil, administered once intraperitoneally 30 minutes prior to ventricular fibrillation (VF). The myocardial interstitial fluid (ISF) concentrations of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate and glycerol were determined by microdialysis before VF. Afterward, the piglets were subjected to 8 minutes of untreated VF followed by 15 minutes of open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation. ISF was collected continuously and the experiment was terminated 24 hours after resuscitation.ResultsAfter 8 min of untreated VF, the sidenafil group exhibited higher glucose and pyruvate concentrations of ISF and lower lactate and glutamate levels in comparison with the SA group, and reached statistical significance (P <0.05, respectively). Advanced cardiac life support was delivered to both groups, where 24-hour survival rate expressed a promising trend in the sildenafil group (7/8 versus 3/8 survivors, P <0.05). Compared with the SA group, the sildenafil group had a better outcome in hemodynamic and oxygen metabolism parameters (P <0.05, respectively). Myocardial tissue analysis revealed a dramatic increase in the contents of ATP, ADP and phosphocreatine in the sildenafil group versus the SA group at 24 hours after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC; P =0.03, P =0.02, P =0.02, respectively). Furthermore, after 24 hours of ROSC, the sildenafil group presented marked elevations of the activities of left ventricle Na+-K+-ATPase and Ca2+-ATPase than in the SA group (P =0.03, P =0.04, respectively).ConclusionsSildenafil could reduce the severity of post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction and had better clearance of metabolic waste in the ISF. This work might provide insights into the development of a novel strategy to treat post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,784,344
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,874
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,963
of 367,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#96
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.