You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The quantity, quality and characteristics of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian mentoring literature: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1263 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roxanne Bainbridge, Komla Tsey, Janya McCalman, Simon Towle |
Abstract |
Mentoring is a key predictor of empowerment and prospectively a game changer in the quest to improve health inequities. This systematic review reports on the state of evidence on mentoring for Indigenous Australians by identifying the quantity, nature, quality and characteristics of mentoring publications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
Researcher | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 26 | 21% |
Unknown | 34 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 21 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 13% |
Psychology | 13 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 15% |
Unknown | 41 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,301,927
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,534
of 15,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,392
of 357,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#84
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.